DT&L: Schedule

Skip to main content

Help Center

Contents
You are here:
< All Topics

Before Week 1

You can complete this deliverable by visiting the “Before We Begin” page on ShannonWeb.

Week 1, Class 1 | Why DT&L?

Discuss During Class (Wednesday)
  • Introduction to DT&L
    • DT&L Project
    • Team Organization
    • Project Focus

Week 2: Class 2 | Alumni Day

Monday: MLK Day, No Class

During Class (Wednesday)

  • Discussion with DT&L Alumni
Deliverable(s)

Week 3, Class 3 & 4 | Snow Day || Innovation Hub (Walsh Library, 1st Floor)

During Class (Monday)
  • Snow Day
During Class (Wednesday)
  • Innovation Hub Introduction

Deliverable(s)

Week 4, Classes 5 & 6 | Digital Tools || Gretzky Portfolio & DT&L Project Expectations

During Class (Monday)

  • WordPress Overview

During Class (Wednesday)

  • Gretzky Portfolio & DT&L Project Expectations

Week 5, Classes 7 & 8 | Deliverables Review || Overview of Strategic Foresight | Futures Thinking

Review Before Class (Monday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course

During Class (Monday)

  • Review DT&L Deliverables expectations

During Class (Wednesday)

Introduction to strategic foresight and its importance in contemporary society and business. We begin discussing foresight, strategic planning, and future thinking. Techniques such as scenario planning and trend analysis will be introduced to help us anticipate and prepare for future scenarios.

Review Before Class (Wednesday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
During Class (Wednesday)
  • Definition and principles of strategic foresight, its history, and real-world applications
  • Understanding strategic foresight and future studies
  • Techniques in strategic foresight: Scenario planning, Fringe sketch, etc.
  • Importance and use of strategic foresight in various fields
  • Practical examples of strategic foresight
Deliverable(s)
  • Gretzky Portfolio (WordPress) initial setup (including “About Me” page) due before Saturday at 11:31p ET
    • Range is a primary resource supporting the development of your Gretzky Portfolio
  • The Fourth Turning Is Here, Part II

Week 6, Classes 9 & 10 | Generational Change || Visit With A Futurist

Review Before Class (Monday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course

During Class (Monday)

We are living through a period in which disruption is not driven by any single technology, ideology, or policy choice, but by the interaction of demographic change, accelerating technological systems, institutional strain, political volatility, and a shifting global order. These pressures are intensified by generational turnover, as emerging cohorts bring new expectations about work, authority, risk, and technology into systems designed for earlier eras. Because these forces are compounding rather than additive, understanding this moment requires openness to change, adaptability to rapidly evolving conditions, the ability to envision alternative institutional arrangements, and the capacity to sustain judgment in the face of uncertainty. Rather than forecasting a single future, this analysis maps the present conditions that make certain futures more plausible than others, helping students understand why many institutions feel simultaneously overwhelmed, brittle, and resistant to change, and why developing the capacity to respond thoughtfully matters as much as predicting what comes next.

Review Before Class (Wednesday)
Review the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
During Class (Wednesday)

Deliverable(s)

Week 7, Class 11 & 12 | Demographic & Social Forces

Review Before Class
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course

During Class

We will examine how aging populations, declining birth rates, migration, and generational turnover are reshaping labor markets, social expectations, and institutional legitimacy. We will explore how demographic pressures strain pension systems, healthcare, and public finance while simultaneously altering attitudes toward work, authority, and credentials. The discussion highlights growing intergenerational tension and declining trust in institutions, emphasizing how demographic realities constrain legal, technological, and economic change in ways that are often invisible but deeply consequential.

Deliverable(s)

Week 8 | Spring Break (No Classes)

Week 9, Classes 13 & 14 | Technological Acceleration & Digital Infrastructure || Economic & Institutional Pressures

Review Before Class (Monday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course

During Class (Monday)

We will shift from individual technologies to system-level acceleration, with a focus on artificial intelligence, platforms, data extraction, and algorithmic decision-making. We will analyze how innovation now outpaces institutional adaptation, producing regulatory lag, accountability gaps, and systemic fragility. Rather than asking whether technology is “good” or “bad,” this section emphasizes how scale, speed, and embeddedness reshape power, resilience, and human judgment across society.

Review Before Class (Wednesday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • How Has U.S. Health Spending Changed Over Time? (Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker)
    • Puts hard numbers behind healthcare’s long-run affordability problem. Supports data-driven discussion of sustainability and tradeoffs between coverage, cost, and resilience.
    • FAIR: Resilience, Adaptability
  • Digest of Education Statistics (Finance + Outcomes Tables) (NCES)
    • Primary data for tracing tuition growth, public funding shifts, and institutional cost structures. Enables students to move from “opinions about college” to measurable trends.
    • FAIR: Flexibility, Resilience
  • The Long-Term Budget Outlook: 2025 to 2055 (CBO)
    • Shows how demographic change, interest costs, and program obligations squeeze public capacity. Anchors “institutional strain” in credible long-horizon projections.
    • FAIR: Resilience, Adaptability
  • Fiscal Monitor: October 2025 (Issue Page) (IMF)
    • Frames fiscal strain as a global governance problem, not a U.S.-only story. Useful for comparing how different systems distribute risk and sustain public services.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Adaptability
  • Household Debt and Credit Report (Center for Microeconomic Data) (New York Fed)
    • Tracks household balance-sheet pressure, where risk transfer becomes visible. Connects macro strain (prices, rates) to micro fragility (delinquencies, precarity).
    • FAIR: Resilience, Flexibility
  • Global Inequality Data (World Inequality Database (WID)
    • Provides the empirical foundation for discussions of inequality. Helps students connect distributional outcomes to institutional legitimacy and political stability.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Resilience
  • Trust in Government (Topic Hub) (Pew Research Center)
    • Documented long-run decline in trust and partisan differences, key context for why institutional reform is so difficult. Supports discussion of legitimacy during stress.
    • FAIR: Resilience, Adaptability
  • Confidence in Institutions (Historical Trends) (Gallup)
    • A long time-series on institutional confidence that students can compare across sectors. Useful for connecting economic strain to cultural and generational attitudes.
    • FAIR: Adaptability, Resilience
  • Competition Matters (Antitrust/Competition Insights) (FTC)
    • A stable FTC hub for competition policy, enforcement themes, and consolidation framing. Grounds platform power debates in real regulatory work and constraints.
    • FAIR: Flexibility, Adaptability
  • Anti-Monopoly Research (Open Markets Institute)
    • Frames consolidation as a structural power shift that changes bargaining, prices, and innovation paths. Helps students see market design as a legal and institutional choice.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Resilience
  • The Rise of the Superstars (Special Report) (The Economist)
    • Explains why scale advantages concentrate profits and influence in a few firms. Connects “efficiency” narratives to systemic fragility and governance challenges.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Adaptability
  • Don’t Abandon JIT; Revamp It (Harvard Business Review)
    • A concrete case of the efficiency–resilience tradeoff: lean systems are fast, but brittle under shocks. Helps students operationalize “resilience” beyond slogans.
    • FAIR: Resilience, Adaptability
  • Risk & Resilience Insights (McKinsey)
    • A practitioner-facing view of how organizations redesign for volatility, compounding risk, and uncertainty. Useful for translating concepts into institutional strategy language.
    • FAIR: Resilience, Imagination
  • Global Risks Report 2026 (Publication Page) (World Economic Forum)
    • Synthesizes cross-system risks (economic, geopolitical, technological) and how they interact. Useful for teaching why optimizing one variable (cost/speed) can amplify systemic failure modes.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Resilience

During Class (Wednesday)

We will delve into the economic strain on core institutions, such as education, healthcare, and public services, many of which operate under increasingly unsustainable models. We will examine cost disease, rising debt, inequality, platform-driven consolidation, and the shift of risk from institutions to individuals. A central theme is the tension between efficiency and resilience, and why systems optimized for speed and cost often fail under stress.

Deliverable(s)

Week 10, Classes 15 & 16 | Legal & Regulatory Environment

Review Before Class
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • World Economic Forum – Agile Governance (PDF)
    • Introduces agile governance as a model for regulatory systems responding to rapid change.
    • Law often lags innovation. Agile governance explores how institutions might anticipate rather than react.
    • FAIR: Adaptability, Imagination
  • Regulatory Policy & Governance (OECD)
    • Global standards and frameworks for improving regulatory design and quality.
    • Institutional design determines whether regulation produces stability or friction.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • The Three Challenges of AI Regulation (Brookings)
    • Identifies complexity, speed, and uncertainty as core barriers to effective AI regulation.
    • Regulatory lag is structural, not accidental.
    • FAIR: Flexibility, Adaptability
  • Mapping the Regulatory Landscape for New Technologies (Lawfare)
    • Explains fragmentation in U.S. oversight of emerging technologies.
    • Jurisdictional conflict redistributes risk and shapes enforcement gaps.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo (2024)
    • Decision overturning Chevron deference.
    • Judicial philosophy now plays a larger role in shaping regulatory authority.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • West Virginia v. EPA (2022)
    • Expands the major questions doctrine.
    • Signals judicial skepticism toward expansive administrative authority.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Major Questions Doctrine (Cornell LII)
    • Clear explanation of the doctrine shaping modern administrative law.
    • Judicial limits affect the pace and scope of regulation.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • EU AI Act Overview (European Commission)
    • Risk-based regulatory framework for AI in the EU.
    • Global divergence increases compliance complexity and geopolitical tension.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • EU AI Act (Official Text) (EUR-Lex)
    • Full legal text of the AI Act.
    • Regulatory language signals societal priorities around risk and oversight.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Translation of China’s Generative AI Measures (Stanford DigiChina)
    • English translation of China’s generative AI regulations.
    • Regulatory models reflect institutional philosophy and political systems.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • E-Commerce Negotiations (WTO)
    • Ongoing negotiations over global digital trade rules.
    • Digital sovereignty collides with cross-border commerce.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Section 230 Overview (Electronic Frontier Foundation)
    • Explains intermediary liability protections.
    • Liability allocation determines who bears platform risk.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • Rule of Law Index (World Justice Project)
    • Measures rule-of-law strength globally.
    • Legal legitimacy underpins market and democratic stability.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Law and Finance (La Porta et al.)
    • Foundational study linking legal systems to economic development.
    • Law structures incentives long before disruption becomes visible.
    • FAIR: Flexibility

During Class

Law is both a stabilizing force and a source of friction in periods of rapid change. We will analyze how legal systems often respond reactively rather than proactively to technological and social disruption, creating enforcement gaps and jurisdictional conflicts. We will consider how evolving judicial philosophies, administrative authority, and global regulatory divergence shape incentives, distribute risk, and signal societal priorities, often after underlying systems have already transformed.

Deliverable(s)

Week 11, Classes 17 & 18 | Domestic Political Dynamics

Review Before Class
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • Public Trust in Government: 1958–2025 (Pew Research Center)
    • Longitudinal data tracking six decades of declining trust in the federal government.
    • Trust is the stabilizing currency of democratic governance. Its erosion alters legitimacy, compliance, and policy durability.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Confidence in Institutions (Gallup)
    • Annual tracking of confidence in major American institutions.
    • Institutional weakness feeds distrust, reinforcing cycles of fragility.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • 2025 Trust Barometer (Edelman)
    • Global survey of trust in government, business, NGOs, and media.
    • Distrust is systemic, not confined to politics alone.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Truth Decay Project (RAND)
    • Research examining declining reliance on facts in civic discourse.
    • Governance becomes reactive when shared facts erode.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Global Risks Report 2026 (World Economic Forum)
    • Identifies governance failure and polarization as systemic risks.
    • Domestic instability now acts as a global risk multiplier.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Government at a Glance 2025 (OECD)
    • Comparative data on trust and government performance across democracies.
    • Institutional design affects governance resilience.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Democracy Report 2025 (V-Dem Institute)
    • Empirical analysis of democratic backsliding worldwide.
    • Polarization and executive overreach undermine long-term planning.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Freedom in the World 2025 (Freedom House)
    • Annual assessment of political rights and civil liberties.
    • Institutional erosion unfolds gradually through weakened norms.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Harvard Youth Poll (Harvard IOP)
    • Survey of young Americans’ trust and political engagement.
    • Generational shifts shape future institutional legitimacy.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Stanford Politics and Social Change Lab
    • Research hub studying affective polarization and democratic norms.
    • Emotional polarization undermines coordinated problem-solving.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Local Election Officials Under Pressure (2025) (Brennan Center)
    • Survey documenting stress facing election administrators.
    • Administrative capacity is foundational to democratic resilience.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2025 (Transparency International)
    • Global corruption index measuring public-sector integrity.
    • Perceived corruption accelerates distrust and policy instability.
    • FAIR: Resilience

During Class

Our discussion focuses on declining trust, polarization, and short-termism within domestic political systems. We will explore how governance increasingly becomes reactive and crisis-driven, undermining policy coherence and long-term planning. The discussion highlights feedback loops in which institutional weakness fuels public distrust, further eroding the capacity for coordinated and durable solutions.

Deliverable(s)

  • P2: DT&L Project Interim Report Due Before 9:48p ET

Week 12, Classes 19 & 20 | Geopolitical & Global Order Shifts

Review Before Class
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course

During Class

We will examine how the global order is moving toward multipolar competition marked by trade fragmentation, techno-nationalism, and strategic rivalry. This discussion emphasizes the fragility of globally optimized supply chains and the reclassification of technology, data, and energy as strategic assets. Legal systems, business strategy, and domestic governance are analyzed through the lens of global power dynamics rather than isolated national choices.

Deliverable(s)

  • Level 3 Artifact Due Before 9:48p ET

Week 13, Class 21 | Ethical & Cultural Undercurrents

Easter Monday: No Class

Review Before Class (Wednesday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • Machine Bias (ProPublica)
    • Landmark investigation into algorithmic risk scoring in criminal justice.
    • Demonstrates how responsibility becomes obscured when software systems mediate decisions.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Algorithmic Accountability for the Public Sector (AI Now Institute)
    • Explores procurement, oversight, and governance gaps in public-sector AI adoption.
    • Grounds ethical debate in institutional realities rather than abstract principles.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST)
    • Framework for identifying and managing AI risks across the lifecycle.
    • Provides a structured way to ask where accountability resides and what risks are measurable.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • Surveillance Technologies Overview (ACLU)
    • Explainer on modern surveillance systems and civil liberties risks.
    • Shows how autonomy erodes when monitoring becomes ambient and normalized.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Artificial Intelligence Topic Hub (EFF)
    • Collection of civil liberties analyses on AI and digital rights.
    • Connects platform power to the lived experience of privacy and speech constraints.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Public and Expert Views of AI (Pew Research Center)
    • Survey research comparing public and expert perceptions of AI.
    • Highlights generational and experiential differences in trust and risk perception.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • The Frontier Firm (2025) (Microsoft Work Trend Index)
    • Research on human-AI collaboration and evolving workplace models.
    • Illustrates how professional identity and judgment shift when AI becomes embedded in workflow.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • Edelman Trust Barometer (2026)
    • Annual global trust survey across institutions.
    • Ethical outsourcing occurs amid declining institutional trust and legitimacy.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Global Risks Report 2026 (World Economic Forum)
    • System-level overview of interconnected technological and societal risks.
    • Places AI ethics within the broader context of structural fragility and systemic stress.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Recommendation on the Ethics of AI (UNESCO)
    • Global normative framework emphasizing human rights and dignity.
    • Reasserts that certain moral decisions should not be outsourced to automated systems.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Framework Convention on AI (Council of Europe)
    • A legally binding treaty focused on human rights and the rule of law in AI governance.
    • Moves ethics from voluntary standards to enforceable institutional commitments.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • AI Index Report 2025 (Stanford HAI)
    • Comprehensive annual data on AI, deployment, and policy.
    • Explains why ethical pressure intensifies as deployment accelerates globally.
    • FAIR: Adaptability

During Class (Wednesday)

Ethics in this discussion is grounded in lived experience rather than abstract theory. We will explore how responsibility becomes diffused as decisions are mediated or made by systems, platforms, and algorithms. We will examine shifting norms regarding autonomy, privacy, dignity, and professional identity, asking who bears risk, who benefits, and who decides in a world in which moral judgment is increasingly outsourced.

Deliverable(s)

  • DT&L Final Projects Due Before 9:48p ET

Week 14, Classes 22 & 23 | Interactions, Tensions, and Feedback Loops

Review Before Class
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
During Class

We will integrate our prior discussion of systems to show how disruption is compounded by reinforcing feedback loops. Students analyze how technological acceleration, economic inequality, demographic pressure, and institutional weakness amplify one another, increasing systemic risk. Attention is given to leverage points, small interventions in governance, transparency, or design, that can produce disproportionate effects in complex systems.

Deliverable(s)

  • Complete Review of DT&L Final Projects in Preparation for Discussion

Week 15, Classes 24 & 25 | Plausible 5–10 Year Macro Futures || Framing Questions for Future Focus

Review Before Class (Monday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • Global Risks Report 2024 (World Economic Forum)
    • System-level mapping of interconnected global risks.
    • Demonstrates how overlapping risks generate multiple plausible futures.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Resilience
  • Strategic Foresight Program (OECD)
  • Government-focused foresight and preparation tools.
    • Models preparation without prediction.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Foresight Toolkit for Resilient Public Policy (OECD)
    • Applied scenario and stress-testing framework.
    • Provides method, not just theory.
    • FAIR: Flexibility, Resilience
  • Decision Making Under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) (RAND)
    • Framework for policy decisions without reliable probabilities.
    • Encourages robust rather than optimal strategies.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • World Economic Outlook Hub (IMF)
    • Macroeconomic outlook and policy framing.
    • Anchors managed adaptation in economic realities.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Technology & Innovation (Brookings)
    • Research on governance and technological change.
    • Connects institutional reform to tech acceleration.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Technology and International Affairs (Carnegie Endowment)
    • Geopolitics of AI and emerging tech.
    • Illustrates fragmentation and techno-nationalism.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Resilience
  • GeoTech Center (Atlantic Council)
    • Digital sovereignty and strategic competition.
    • Shows how standards and alliances drive divergence.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • Trust Barometer 2026 (Edelman)
    • Cross-country institutional trust data.
    • Trust erosion shapes governance futures.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Public Trust in Government (Pew Research Center)
    • Long-term trend data on civic trust.
    • Quantifies legitimacy decline.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Freedom in the World (Freedom House)
    • Tracking democratic backsliding globally.
    • Institutional strain alters legal and political systems.
    • FAIR: Adaptability, Resilience
  • Our Common Agenda (United Nations)
    • Blueprint for institutional renewal and cooperation.
    • Offers a recalibration pathway.
    • FAIR: Imagination, Adaptability

During Class (Monday)

Rather than predicting a single outcome, we will discuss several plausible macro-level trajectories for the next decade, including managed adaptation, fragmentation and divergence, concentrated power amid declining trust, and human-centered recalibration. We will learn to recognize elements of each future already emerging and to assess trade-offs among efficiency, legitimacy, resilience, and growth. The emphasis is on judgment under uncertainty rather than forecasting precision.

Review Before Class (Wednesday)
Read/Watch the following in sufficient depth so that you can participate in an informed discussion and use these resources throughout the course
  • Public Trust in Government (Pew Research Center)
    • Long-term data on institutional trust in the United States.
    • Institutional legitimacy determines whether reform efforts succeed or fail.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • 2024 Trust Barometer (Edelman)
    • Global survey of trust across business, government, media, and NGOs.
    • Trust gaps signal governance fragility and social polarization.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • Freedom in the World Report (Freedom House)
    • Global democratic performance assessment.
    • Identifies where political systems are becoming more or less adaptable.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • AI Governance Research (Brookings Institution)
    • Policy research on regulating emerging technologies.
    • Explores how law balances flexibility with accountability.
    • FAIR: Flexibility
  • AI Index Report (Stanford HAI)
    • Annual data-driven analysis of global AI development and regulation.
    • Enables signal tracking of regulatory shifts and innovation pace.
    • FAIR: Adaptability
  • EU Artificial Intelligence Act Overview (European Parliament)
    • Summary of the EU AI regulatory framework.
    • A live example of structured accountability in emerging tech.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • World Population Prospects (United Nations)
    • Global demographic projections.
    • Aging populations and fertility decline reshape institutional sustainability.
    • FAIR: Imaginatio
  • National Population Projections (U.S. Census Bureau)
    • Long-term demographic modeling for the U.S.
    • Demographics influence labor markets and entitlement systems.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • World Economic Outlook (International Monetary Fund)
    • Global macroeconomic risk assessments.
    • Economic strain reduces institutional room for experimentation.
    • FAIR: Resilience
  • Global Risks Report 2024 (World Economic Forum)
    • Interconnected global risk assessment.
    • Encourages systems-level thinking rather than siloed analysis.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Signals & Forecasting (Institute for the Future)
    • Strategic foresight methods and weak-signal tracking.
    • Teaches preparation over prediction.
    • FAIR: Imagination
  • Algorithmic Accountability Research (Data & Society)
    • Research on platform power and algorithmic governance.
    • Examines diffusion of responsibility in AI-mediated systems.
    • FAIR: Flexibility

During Class (Wednesday)

Our final discussion will develop questions for guiding ongoing analysis. It emphasizes identifying where institutional failures are most consequential, which systems remain adaptable, and how law should balance flexibility with accountability. Students are encouraged to track signals, demographic trends, regulatory shifts, trust indicators, and institutional reforms to develop foresight-driven judgment about where attention and intervention are most needed.

Deliverable(s)

  • Gretzky Portfolio Due Before 10:24p ET

Week 16, Classes 26 & 27 | DT&L Project Discussions

Review Before Class 
  • Review DT&L Projects in preparation for discussion of summaries
Discuss During Class 
  • DT&L Project Summary discussions
    • (Monday)
    • (Wednesday)

Week 17, Class 28 | Course Wrap, Gretzky Portfolios and Future Trends

We will review the course’s key themes and explore potential future trends in digital transformation, AI, and law. We will assess progress since the pre-course Gretzky Evaluation and evaluate future preparedness for personal and professional success
During Class 
  • Review of the major themes of the course
  • Identification and exploration of future trends in digital transformation, AI, and law
  • Assess progress since the pre-course Gretzky Evaluations
  • Evaluate future preparedness for personal and professional success
Tags:
Posted in .